Lindsay Clancy: Reddington Was Ready to Start Over—If This Failed

Lindsay Clancy’s first jury left without a verdict. Her lawyer was ready to return to court within days.

Kevin Reddington asked for an expedited chance to argue that the prosecution hadn’t proved enough to convict. He also proposed moving quickly into another trial if the judge refused. Neither request guaranteed that timetable.

Tony Brueski follows the decisions that could bring a new jury into this case, along with the consequences for Patrick Clancy and a family still living with the loss.

Would another trial get prosecutors a different result—and what would it cost the people asked to relive it?

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1
Substack: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X: https://x.com/tonybpod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #TrueCrimeToday #TonyBrueski #KevinReddington #PatrickClancy #HungJury #Mistrial #Massachusetts #ClancyUpdate #TrueCrimeCommunity