Lindsay Clancy's Lawyer Claims WHAT About Evidence?!

Kevin Reddington spent an entire trial arguing Lindsay Clancy killed her three children but wasn't criminally responsible because of postpartum psychosis. He previously offered to stipulate the act in writing. Then he stood before Judge William Sullivan and said there is no evidence she did it. The Rule 25 motion asks the court to find that prosecutors failed to prove their case — and to enter a not-guilty finding without a retrial. Prosecutors told the judge they'd never heard this argument from the defense before. The judge delayed his ruling until November 2. This segment unpacks the legal mechanics, what the shift means for Patrick Clancy, and whether any judge would actually grant this. Clancy has pleaded not guilty.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #Rule25 #PlymouthCourt #Mistrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PostpartumPsychosis #Duxbury #MassachusettsCrime