What Reddington Did to the Juror After the Clancy Mistrial

Eleven jurors voted to acquit Lindsay Clancy by reason of insanity. One man held out. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington demanded the court investigate him, accused him of misconduct and of lying during jury selection, and identified his gender in a press conference. Media reported the man's name and personal background. He now has his own attorney. Judge Sullivan scheduled a hearing on Reddington's investigation motion for November 2 — alongside the defense's motion to dismiss the charges entirely. This segment examines whether a defense attorney targeting a holdout juror is aggressive lawyering or a calculated act of intimidation aimed at future jury pools. Clancy has pleaded not guilty.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HoldoutJuror #JuryDuty #Mistrial #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers #PlymouthCourt #Duxbury #JurorRights