Police Worried Royal Permission Could Derail Searches of Andrew’s Homes (10/19/26)
Newly released High Court documents showed that Thames Valley Police feared Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor could obstruct searches of his properties by arguing that officers needed permission from King Charles because the residences or property belonged to the Crown. Police searched Royal Lodge in Windsor and Andrew’s home on the Sandringham Estate in February while investigating allegations that he improperly shared sensitive government information with Jeffrey Epstein during his time as the UK’s special representative for trade and investment. Investigators specifically sought paperwork, diaries, business records and other documents connected to Andrew’s official work, telling the judge who issued the warrants that advance notice or attempts to obtain royal permission could jeopardize the investigation or lead to the loss of evidence. The filings said police regarded Andrew as a suspect in several serious offences, including allegations that he forwarded official reports concerning overseas trade missions to Epstein within minutes of receiving them.
The searches have since become the subject of a significant legal fight because Thames Valley Police conceded that the warrants used to raid Andrew’s properties were unlawful. Andrew, who was arrested on February 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office and later released under investigation, denied wrongdoing and challenged both the searches and the police justification for conducting them without first seeking his cooperation. His lawyers argued that officers never contacted Andrew or his legal team to ask for voluntary access and disputed suggestions that he could not be trusted to cooperate. Police, meanwhile, have asked the court for permission to retain evidence seized during the unlawful searches, a request Andrew is opposing. That question is expected to be decided at a private hearing in 2027, leaving both the fate of the seized material and the broader criminal investigation unresolved.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Police feared Andrew would block searches by demanding King’s permission | The Independent
The searches have since become the subject of a significant legal fight because Thames Valley Police conceded that the warrants used to raid Andrew’s properties were unlawful. Andrew, who was arrested on February 19 on suspicion of misconduct in public office and later released under investigation, denied wrongdoing and challenged both the searches and the police justification for conducting them without first seeking his cooperation. His lawyers argued that officers never contacted Andrew or his legal team to ask for voluntary access and disputed suggestions that he could not be trusted to cooperate. Police, meanwhile, have asked the court for permission to retain evidence seized during the unlawful searches, a request Andrew is opposing. That question is expected to be decided at a private hearing in 2027, leaving both the fate of the seized material and the broader criminal investigation unresolved.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
Police feared Andrew would block searches by demanding King’s permission | The Independent
You May Also Like

Was wichtig ist
Die Presse

DW News Brief
DW
NOS Met het Oog op Morgen
NPO Radio 1 / NOS

The Moscow Murders and More
Bobby Capucci

Beyond The Horizon
Bobby Capucci

SBS Korean - SBS 한국어 프로그램
SBS

The Diddy Diaries
Bobby Capucci

Fox News Radio 1 Minute Newscast
FOX News Podcasts

Israel Today: Ongoing War Report
Israel Today: Ongoing War Report

The Fox News Rundown
FOX News Radio
Community discussion