Alex Acosta, The DOJ And The Disgraceful Commitment To Defending The Epstein NPA (11/5/25)
The Department of Justice’s continued defense of Jeffrey Epstein’s non-prosecution agreement is a national disgrace, the clearest evidence yet that the system was never built to hold the powerful accountable. Alex Acosta, the U.S. Attorney who cut the deal, admitted under oath that he barely knew the facts of the case yet somehow decided it was a “50/50” call — all while relying on advice from Matthew Menchel, a man later revealed to be friendly with Epstein himself. Emails went missing, prosecutors who fought for the victims were ignored, and the entire case was quietly rerouted from Palm Beach to Washington, where the real fix was brokered behind closed doors. Golf course handshakes, backroom whispers, and D.C. connections did more to save Epstein than any courtroom argument ever could, and everyone involved knew exactly what they were doing. That infamous NPA wasn’t a mistake — it was a masterpiece of corruption, the only one of its kind in American legal history, granting immunity not just to Epstein but to everyone who may have trafficked or abused under his umbrella. And years later, the DOJ still has the nerve to say “no laws were broken,” as if that means anything when the law itself was twisted into a shield for the powerful. The Epstein deal wasn’t justice — it was the funeral of it. Every excuse, every shrug, every “it was complicated” from Acosta and his peers only confirms what’s been obvious since day one: the system didn’t fail by accident. It worked exactly as intended — to protect the rich, bury the truth, and leave the victims behind. to conact me: [email protected]
You May Also Like

Hintergrund
Deutschlandfunk

Siste nytt fra VG
VG

Noticentro
Audio Centro

Full Story
The Guardian

Čteme vám Seznam Zprávy
Seznam Zprávy

ABC News Update
ABC News

Bloomberg News Now
Bloomberg

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles
Bobby Capucci

MATÉRIAS CBN
Rádio CBN

Kan Hourly News כאן רשת ב חדשות השעה
Mr. Mp3
Community discussion