Loading...
Please wait

Distortionism: The Crooked Horizon
The Deeper Thinking Podcast is digitally narrated.
For those drawn to truth in resonance, the crooked paths of bias, and the wonder of living within illusion.
#Distortionism #DayCart #ImmanuelKant #FriedrichNietzsche #Buddhism #CognitiveBias #Postmodernism #Philosophy
What if distortion is not the fog but the lens itself? In this episode we introduce Distortionism, a new philosophy that argues we do not merely encounter bias—we are bias. Distortion is not a flaw in thought but the condition of thought. Drawing from Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Nietzsche, Buddhism, and cognitive bias, we explore how illusion structures experience, politics, memory, and even theology.
This is not a call to cynicism. Distortion shelters us in grief, binds us in culture, and orients us in politics. The challenge is not to abolish it but to steward it—through humility, compassion, irony, discipline, and art. Theology, too, is reborn here as the crooked infinite: the awe of an unreachable horizon bending away as we approach.
We close with the myth of the Crooked Horizon, where Straight-Seeker, Nihilist, Iron Believer, and Wanderer each respond to the crooked path. Only the Wanderer accepts distortion, and by arranging it, endures.
Reflections
Why Listen?
Listen On:
Support This Work - give me 5 stars on apple podcasts please.
If this episode stayed with you and you’d like to support the ongoing work, you can do so here: Buy Me a Coffee
Bibliography
Bibliography Relevance
Truth is not what remains when distortions vanish. It is what resonates when crookedness is arranged with care.
#Distortionism #CrookedHorizon #Bias #PhilosophyOfTruth #Epistemology #PoliticalPhilosophy #MoralPhilosophy #Theology #PublicPhilosophy #Ethics #TheDeeperThinkingPodcast #Resonance #CognitiveBias #Postmodernism #Philosophy #ModernMyth
About
Philosophy has often imagined distortion as something to be peeled away, an illusion to be corrected, bias to be minimized, appearance to be overcome. From Descartes methodological doubt to Kant’s categ