When does “Dear Mr. Patel” show respect—and when does “Hi Raj” show better judgment? Today’s debate dives into the etiquette gap between generations. In this Professional Global Etiquette Debate, AI voices examine the tension between formal, title-driven politeness and the younger generation's push for casual authenticity. One side argues that structure and rituals (such as greetings, honorifics, and hierarchy) prevent offense and protect careers; the other contends that sincerity, speed, and a context-aware tone build trust faster—especially on digital channels like Slack. We examine first impressions, power distance, email versus chat norms, and how global culture (Tokyo versus Stockholm) influences the “right” answer, as presented by Professional Global Etiquette, founded by Adrienne Barker, MAS. Key Takeaways → Default up when uncertain: start formal with new contacts; relax by mirroring their tone. → Titles signal earned expertise in many settings; in others, first names signal partnership. → Channel matters: email tolerates formality; Slack/Teams reward concise, warm clarity. → Culture flips the script: honorifics in high power-distance regions vs. first-name norms in Scandinavia. → Authenticity without awareness reads careless; formality without sincerity reads robotic. → Practical rule: ask preferences, mirror back, and calibrate for role, risk, and relationship stage. Share this episode and tag @Professional Global Etiquette. Book a workshop on bridging generational etiquette gaps with Adrienne Barker, MAS.
