Lindsay Clancy's Prosecution Is Building the Wrong Case

The prosecution in the Lindsay Clancy trial set out to prove she was sane and acted deliberately. Three weeks in, its own witnesses have told the jury she was a wonderful mother who was deteriorating while the medical system watched. Patrick Clancy described a Seroquel spiral. The nanny saw a devoted parent. The psychiatrist admitted she never met Lindsay in person.

The defense conceded Lindsay killed her children and is arguing she was consumed by postpartum psychosis. Kevin Reddington has used the prosecution's witnesses to build his own case — exposing telehealth-only treatment, incomplete records, and a prescribing pattern he's called horrific. He told the jury Lindsay heard voices. The psychosis diagnosis didn't come until after the crime.

And on TikTok, creators are accusing Patrick Clancy of being the real killer. They're comparing him to Chris Watts and scrutinizing his remarriage while both sides in the courtroom agree Lindsay did it.

Defense attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis covers all three angles — the prosecution's problems, the defense's strategy and risks, and the legal question of what Patrick can do about conspiracy theories targeting him during the trial.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.