Did Tinder Cause BLM & Me Too? Could it Lead to Males & Females Speciating?

Did hookup culture and swipe apps like Tinder create the massive political and cultural divide between young men and women? In this Based Camp episode, Malcolm and Simone Collins break down shocking new polling data showing young women are far more negative toward men than vice versa, explore how Tinder supercharged resentment and radicalization, and discuss everything from MeToo to artificial wombs and potential speciation between the sexes.

They cover:• The timeline correlation between Tinder’s rise and women shifting hard left• Why short-term mating markets destroy long-term relationship prospects• Male vs female responsibility in modern dating chaos• The anime that predicted male/female civilizations splitting• Practical advice for men seeking real partners and why “high value” looksmaxxing can backfire

A raw, data-heavy, and unfiltered conversation on one of the biggest societal fractures of our time.

BTW, here is Revy the MGTOW’s Google Doc guide to having kids via surrogate as an unattached man.

Show Notes

The Landscape

New polling conducted for the New Statesman in the UK in early 2026 found that young women (esp 25–30) have significantly more negative views of men than young men have of women.

* The New Statesman poll was carried out by pollster Scarlett Maguire and colleagues on attitudes between young men and women in Britain, published around 14 April 2026.

Here’s the polling (archive link): Revealed: the new radicalism among young women

Merlin Strategy’s exclusive polling reveals a growing gender divide among under-30s

What they found:

* About 72% of young men report a favorable view of young women, and only around 7% report an unfavorable view.

* Among women under 30, only about half report a favorable view of men, and around one fifth (about 21%) report an unfavorable view.

* Among women under 25, only about 35% express a positive view of men at all, and just about 11% describe their view as “very positive.”

* Commentary around the poll notes that young women are “three times as likely” to hold a negative view of men as young men are to hold a negative view of women.

* 40% of young women say men don’t share their understanding of consent in relationships (only 25% of men say the same about women).

* Young women are twice as likely as young men to say they don’t want children (15% women vs. 8% men). Among white women under 30, it’s 20%.

* 1 in 4 young women say a partner’s different political views is a red flag.

* 60% would find it difficult to date someone who disagrees on Palestine/Israel or Trump.

* 74% say the same about disagreements on social justice.

* Young women are more likely than men to rule out partners over immigration views.

The Thesis

On X, Rae (@dystopiangf) wrote: “Casual sex is unironically a huge part of why so many women have become politically radicalized. If you ask a random woman why she hates men, 95% chance it boils down to sexual grievance, accumulated from embarrassing experiences like the OP. In other words, women are the real incels (in spirit).

I witnessed this myself in college: one too many bad situationships, and they begin to carry this feeling of being a piece of meat everywhere, projecting it onto “society” despite there being zero material evidence of structural misogyny in the West. The bitter irony is that hookup / situationship culture is a byproduct of feminism; they fought for the ability to be treated like pieces of meat, to be equal to men sexual the way gay men are with each other, but the attainment of this freedom has done nothing but foment an even deeper hatred of their father’s civilization”

This is in response to someone sharing a screenshot from a post-hookup story a woman posted on tiktok.

* The caption OP had put was: “situationship breakups are so crazy bc why did this man just tell me the only person he wants to be with is his ex and then immediately make me eggs on toast. He nutted in me like 10mins after this. what in god’s name is happening”

* Moe Bible chipped in: “Women will post this s**t and then wonder why the entire planet and every major religion has imposed strict social restrictions on their sovereignty since the dawn of time in every place humans have ever lived”

The Shadowbanned wrote: “Let’s at least sympathize here - the man does not need to do this to her. Just because a girl is willing to put out doesnt mean you have to take her up on the offer.”

* To which Rae responded: “I do tend to think that volcels are the most noble of men”

More discourse for the interested: https://x.com/i/trending/2046981384204358126

Did Hookup Culture Predate Male-Female Political Polarization?

Yes. Yes it did.

Timeline of Hookup Culture / Casual Sex Norms

Casual, non-committed sexual encounters have deep historical roots but became more normalized and visible in specific eras due to social and technological changes:

* Early 1800s–1920s: Historians trace elements of casual sex and shifting courtship to the early 19th century, with acceleration in the 1920s. Automobiles, movie theaters, and urban youth culture allowed mixed-sex socializing away from parental supervision. This marked a shift from formal courtship to “dating.” Fraternity culture (from the 1820s) also played a role in college settings.

* 1960s Sexual Revolution: A major inflection point. Feminism, the birth control pill, declining stigma around premarital sex, and college party scenes decoupled sex from marriage/relationships. This era saw widespread acceptance of casual encounters, especially among young adults.

* 1970s–1990s: Premarital and casual sex became more common and visible. By the mid-1990s, “hookup” behaviors were established on campuses. The term “hookup culture” gained prominence around 2000, but data shows similar (or even higher) rates of sexual activity in earlier decades (e.g., comparisons of 1988–1996 vs. 2002–2010 college students).

Hookup culture isn’t entirely new—casual sex existed before—but modern forms (peer-driven, alcohol-fueled, decoupled from courtship) crystallized post-1960s and were amplified by media and apps later.

Timeline of Male-Female Political Polarization

The partisan gender gap (women leaning more Democratic/liberal, men more Republican/conservative) is relatively recent in its modern form:

* Pre-1960s: Minimal or inconsistent gaps. In the 1950s, women were sometimes slightly more Republican.

* 1960s onward: Divergence began as men and women’s party identifications shifted (linked to civil rights, Southern realignment, and cultural changes). Men moved toward Republicans faster in some cases.

* 1980s–present: Clear and growing gap. Noticeable in the 1980 Reagan election (women less supportive). It widened through the 1990s–2010s, with women more Democratic. Among young people (18–29), the divide has sharpened dramatically in recent years (e.g., post-2016/2020), with young women shifting left and young men moving right or away from Democrats.

Polarization overall increased from the 1970s/1990s (elite sorting, Gingrich era), but the gender-specific aspect accelerated later.

The Swipe-Based Dating Acceleration

Has gendered political polarization intensified even faster following the introduction of swipe-bas