382: How Sarina's Reading Journal Makes Her a Better Novelist: Episode 382
Hi. 🙋♀️ My name is Sarina, and I’m a bit obsessive about stationery products. I’m always on the lookout for a good excuse to buy new pens or a new notebook. But bear with me, because this one is 100% valid: every year I buy a new reading journal, and I use it well. The journal itself is nothing special. It’s just a 200 page B5 (or composition book sized) notebook where I keep track of all the books I’ve read. (Or, in many cases, books I started and did not finish. I’m a big DNFer, because life is short and there are too many books to cover.) At the front of the journal I keep a list of the gems—the books I want to recommend. Plus a long list of things I want to read. But 99% of the pages are given over to my thoughts about the books themselves. Sometimes I only write two lines, and sometimes I cover two pages. When I first began tracking my reading like this, three years ago, I wasn’t very precise about what I wrote down. It was only after I formed a structure for my notes that the process became truly useful to me as a novelist. These days I always note some very specific things. Here they are, and here’s why they help: 1. Genre After I note the title and the author, I write down the genre. Okay—sue me—I actually have a cute set of self-inking stamps that flag the genre. A scary face for thrillers, a dinosaur for anything magical, and hearts for romance. But it would work just as well to write “thriller” at the top of the page. Then, as I read, I make specific notes about the subgenre. Is it a domestic thriller with romantic elements? Is it a romance with a subplot of suspense? We’re always told that our books have to fit in one specific spot on the shelf, or they’ll be unsellable. But the more you force yourself to notice, the more fluid genre appears to be. Here’s an example: I love Karen Slaughter’s Girl Forgotten . It’s a procedural, because the main character is a US Marshall. But here’s the catch—it’s literally her first day on the job. So she doesn’t know what she’s doing. And there’s an element of the crime that’s deeply personal to her, which gives the book more of a domestic (girl with a problem vibe.) Don’t let them put you in a box, at least not until it’s time to actually package the book. 2. Structure Next, I make notes about the book’s structure. Is it single POV, or multi? Past tense? Present? First person or third? Do all the chapters take place in a linear timeline? And I write down which characters have POVs, as they occur. The thing is, I’ve been reading novels for many decades now, and I thought I was well versed with all the possible structures. But by forcing myself to note them down, I see more about each book’s structure than I ever had before. And once in a while I learn some brand new tricks from a close analysis of structure. Example: the psychological thriller Darling Rose Gold by Stephanie Wroblet has a really diabolical structure that kind of blew my mind. 3. Predictions If I’m reading a book with elements of mystery or suspense, I always stop at 35% or 50% to write down how many suspects there are. Who am I mean to suspect? And—crucially—I take a guess at the perpetrator or other secrets yet to be unveiled. I've learned a surprising amount by doing this. For a mystery or thriller, there are usually 3 to 5 suspects. Once in a while, I come up on a book with so many more, like The Last Party by Clare Macintosh . But what's really been interesting is how often I am correct about who the villain is! You’d think that my ability to guess the outcome would hamper my enjoyment of a book. If I'm able to guess the suspect halfway through, doesn't that mean the author failed? Nope. The truth is actually the reverse—some of the books where I’d figured it out early turned out to be my favorites. And sometimes I’m right at 40% but the author changes my mind before I am finally vindicated. **Rubs hands together maniacally** Bottom line—making guesses like this has helped me understand what readers of plot-driven books are really there for—to match wits with the author. Besides, a poorly executed twist is much worse than no twist at all. 4. Setting I always write down the setting. And if I get through the book and have trouble remembering what city we were in, that’s telling, too. 5. Post-it for Quotes Lately, I've been putting one 3 x 3 full stick post-it on each book’s page. Then I try to write a couple of chapter openers on that sticky note. Personally, I find that opening chapters is tricky for me, so I'd like to keep this top-of-mind as a way of observing how other people do it. Sometimes I use the sticky note just for a particular turn of phrase that I enjoy, or some other bit of writing that I appreciate. I guess the point of this exercise is to demystify great writing for myself. Sometimes the best writing is the simplest, and I could make myself crazy imagining that all effective writing sounds like Shakespeare. 6. Flaws Usually, I write a no holds barred review in just a few sen
You May Also Like

Le Cours de l'histoire
France Culture

FlavorVille Radio – Straight Outta the Kitchen (Premiere Episode)
Brian M Inspired

Podcast Patapoe
0d0a

Steven Spierer Show – TalkRadioOne
Steven Spierer Show – TalkRadioOne

Audio Poem of the Day
Poetry Foundation

La voce del poeta
Lorenzo Pieri

London Writers' Salon
Parul Bavishi, Matthew Trinetti

Poisoned Pen Podcast
Poisoned Pen Podcast

きくドラ 名作座
きくドラ~ラジオドラマで聴く名作文学~

SUNNY's Podcast
SUNNY
Community discussion