Redefining the Rules of Engagement

Host Bob Stetson and guest trial lawyer Stephanie Taverna-Siden explore the landmark Massachusetts case Johnson v. Settino, which reshaped the legal landscape of engagement ring disputes.

For decades, courts have treated engagement rings as conditional gifts, requiring marriage to finalize ownership. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently struck down the fault-based standard, adopting a no-fault approach: if the wedding is canceled, the ring goes back—no blame needed.

Bob and Stephanie discuss the legal history of engagement rings, the shift away from antiquated heartbalm laws, and how this ruling modernizes the law. Download a fascinating conversation on the intersection of love, contracts, and the courts.