The US Supreme Court is gearing up for rulings on blockbuster cases that could reshape American democracy, including challenges to the Voting Rights Act in Louisiana v. Caleas, which threatens protections against diluting Black and Latino voting power in redistricting, potentially upending congressional maps before midterms. MS NOW reports experts like Michigan Law professor Leah Litman warn the court is poised to slash federal laws, from Section Two of the Voting Rights Act to birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, and cases like Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook on whether presidents can fire independent officials at the Federal Reserve and FTC. These join disputes over mail-in ballots in Watson v. RNC and campaign spending limits, with critics noting the court's shadow docket has quietly boosted executive power over two dozen times, favoring Trump administration moves on immigration, foreign aid, and agencies.
Separately, a federal judge quashed subpoenas in a probe of Fed Chair Jerome Powell over a $2.5 billion building renovation, with the Justice Department dropping the case due to zero evidence of crimes, as US Attorney Jeanine Pirro announced on X, clearing the path for Kevin Warsh's confirmation as successor. 1News details how Judge James Boasberg called prosecutors' claims thin, shifting scrutiny to the Fed's inspector general.
Polling analyst Harry Enten on CNN highlighted a recent Supreme Court-linked tariff ruling from February, where the court struck down Trump's sweeping tariffs, leading to a refund system for businesses—now deemed a political disaster with record-low congressional approval at 10%. In Virginia, a judge halted a voter-approved redistricting plan amid ongoing battles.
Thanks for tuning in, listeners—subscribe for more updates. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease.ai.
For more
http://www.quietplease.aiGet the best deals
https://amzn.to/3ODvOtaThis content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
