Join Discourse : you know what to do - small monthly pledge , and the community is yours! This week's Spotlight kicks off on the roads of France with a fast-paced Discourse Digest . Remco Evenepoel’s withdrawal sparks a discussion about whether he's fully healthy, or if affected preparation and fuelling challenges might account for his underperformance. Jonas Vingegaard seems to have narrowed one gap to Tadej Pogačar, only to find another expanding on the high-altitude climbs. Ross explains how their previously complementary strengths and weaknesses have evolved into a straight race with, so far, one winner. We also tackle Quinn Simmons’ controversial claims about motorbikes aiding Tim Wellens' stage win—ungracious perhaps, but correct and backed by aerodynamic science. In Center Stage (29:20) , we dive into doping, the media, and trust in sport. Ruth Chepngetich’s diuretic case prompts a wider debate: what are media entitled to ask, and what responsibility do they bear in keeping sport honest? Is asking about doping unfair, or essential? A lively debate on Discourse spills over into the Spotlight! In Ross Replies (55:56) we take on Discourse member Larkim’s question: should sports equipment be modified for women? From volleyball to athletics, we explore where it already happens, and why more sports might benefit from doing the same. But what do women think, and how should sport consider the sometimes conflicting opinions on this issue? And Finally (1:07:20) a study of over 5,000 runners reveals that injury risk spikes after a single big jump in distance—not a gradual increase—reshaping how we think about training load. Links Quinn Simmons on motorbikes and Tim Wellens' response The Aerodynamic paper on motorbikes and cycling performance Article translating the aerodynamic paper for a lay audience Discourse members only - discussion about Chepngetich, as featured in Center Stage The paper on single session running distance as an injury risk factor Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
